Publications:

​

• Gender Disparities Among Highly Cited Researchers in Biomedicine, 2014-2020

  • This study investigates the representation of women among highly cited researchers (HCRs) in the field of biomedicine, acknowledging the potential disparities faced by women authors in terms of citation counts and career advancement within academia.

  • https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357662545_Gender_Disparities_Among_Highly_Cited_Researchers_in_Biomedicine_2014-2020

  • Publisher: JAMA Network Open

​

• Examining the use of supportive and contrasting citations in different disciplines: a brief study using Scite (scite.ai) data

  • This study analyzes citation data from the scite.ai tool to identify disciplines that frequently use supporting or contrasting citations, finding that medicine has the highest frequency of combative citations while mathematics has the lowest, emphasizing the importance of challenging flawed ideas and findings in fields like medicine, and evaluating the efficacy of the scite.ai tool in this contex.

  • https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371796539_Examining_the_use_of_supportive_and_contrasting_citations_in_different_disciplines_a_brief_study_using_Scite_sciteai_data

  • Publisher: Scientometrics

​

• Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: Citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends

  • This study examines the reasons for retraction, pre-and post-retraction citations, and Altmetrics indicators of retracted publications in the medical sciences from 2016 to 2020, finding intentional errors as the most common reason for retraction and high numbers of retractions from China, the United States, and India, with retracted papers receiving citations even after retraction, emphasizing the importance of early detection to mitigate the citation and sharing of retracted publications and minimize their negative impact.

  • https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371532110_Evolution_of_retracted_publications_in_the_medical_sciences_Citations_analysis_bibliometrics_and_altmetrics_trends

  • Publisher: Accountability in Research

​

• Female Authorship Has Increased in Computer and Information Sciences, But Further Growth in Gender Representation is Still Needed

  • Computer science and information science and technology fields have long struggled to increase gender representation. The lack of female/women authors and researchers in these fields has been noted in several studies in past decades. A recent analysis of ten top computer and information science journals indicates that efforts to increase female participation in computer science and information science research fields may have had some effect, as representation of female authors has grown by a significant margin in the past decade. However, there remains a substantial gulf between the number of female authors in these fields compared the male authors.​

  • https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369538018_Female_Authorship_Has_Increased_in_Computer_and_Information_Sciences_But_Further_Growth_in_Gender_Representation_is_Still_Needed

  • Publisher: ASIS&T Mid Year Conference

  • More related research: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Brady-Lund/research